a framework for toolmaking
http://www.learningtoloveyoumore.com
Why: They create assignments for others to do “for their own good”… or is it part of a piece.
Differences: No real concrete “to what end”, the assignements just come, the path isn’t clear to the user. There is a moderated public display… how does that affect the path, the participants experience of the path? The work was/is considered a piece in and of itself. I don’t know that I feel that way about what I am doing. Goodness was right, it is a curriculum.
Ideas: Create exhibits fromt he work, public forum for participants…
Excerpts & Notes
“Learning to Love You More is both a web site and series of non-web presentations comprised of work made by the general public in response to assignments given by artists Miranda July and Harrell Fletcher and various guests. Yuri Ono designs and manages the web site.” - http://www.learningtoloveyoumore.com/hello/index.php
“Creative Capital Foundation is a national nonprofit organization that supports artists pursuing innovative approaches to form and content in the media, performing, and visual arts, and in emerging fields…Learning To Love You More is a recipient of a 2002 grant in the Emerging Fields category and is very grateful to Creative Capital for their support. ” - http://www.learningtoloveyoumore.com/hello/creative_capital.php
=> http://www.creative-capital.org/
- They are up to 46 assignments. They appear to be pick and choose.
- Each assignment has a collection of links called “Reports” of results people have submitted. You can also see just a list of ALL the “reports” by date or the name of the submitor.
- Another link is the one to the places the work has been shown in the real world.
Want your say?
You must be logged in to post a comment.